Housing intensification: Character vs affordability? | Ryan Bridge TODAY
Housing intensification: Character vs affordability? | Ryan Bridge TODAY
NZ Herald ·
Housing intensification: Character vs affordability? | Ryan Bridge TODAY
NZ Herald ·
But what about the poor car parks? Auckland Council hates drivers
what a load of shit, mate. car parks aren't being nuked. stop whinging
ah yes, let's protect the 'character' of our suburbs while kids sleep in cars. priorities
yeah nah get stuffed. we don't need more shoebox apartments with paper thin walls
build up, not out. common sense has left the chat
facts. character's great but not when young families can't even buy a unit
Log in to leave a comment.
they just want to jam more people in with no infrastructure. trains already stuffed
exactly, build up. but councils take forever to approve anything new. bureaucracy wins again
lived in a townhouse for 10 years, it's fine. ppl need to get over themselves
lol cope. progress happens. my townhouse has a courtyard and I can actually afford to live here
keep the villas, build on empty lots. there's heaps of land going to waste in the cbd
spare me the virtue signalling. you live in a house don't you?
ffs cyclists don't pay road tax, why they want to block carparks. everything is broken
talked to my neighbour last week, they're terrified their heritage home will be bulldozed. but also their kids can't afford rent... tough one
so much anger in here. we can have both if we design properly. but who designs properly now with all the cost cutting
meanwhile developers just laughing all the way to the bank. we need affordable housing not more luxury apartments