Who was the man in the missing Goldie portrait?
By Pokere Paewai of RNZA Rotorua iwi says the resurfacing of a missing Goldie portrait is a chance to reclaim the narrative about an ancestor whose role prepar…
NZ Herald ·
By Pokere Paewai of RNZA Rotorua iwi says the resurfacing of a missing Goldie portrait is a chance to reclaim the narrative about an ancestor whose role prepar…
NZ Herald ·
Can someone explain why we care about a 100-year-old painting of some dude we never heard of? Genuinely lost here.
So cool to see this painting resurface! My nan used to tell stories about the old chief who prepared bones for reburial - said he was a real tohunga, not just some random bloke. Nice to see the story being told right for once.
nah, 'reclaim the narrative' is just code for 'let's make it fit our current politics'. Same old same old.
As someone who works with taonga Māori every day, this is huge. The narrative around these portraits and the people in them has been so skewed for decades. Finally some proper context.
Always loved Goldie's work but never knew the story behind this one. Human bone preparation sounds intense though. How did they even do that back then?
I'd like to understand more about the tikanga around bone preparation. Anyone got a link to proper info?
Log in to leave a comment.
Here we go again - everyone rushing to 'reclaim the narrative' like we can just rewrite history to make everything sound nice. The guy prepared bones. That's what he did. Why does everything have to be a 'misunderstood' story these days?
Nah don't get me wrong I'm all for Māori history getting proper attention but the spin is a bit much. Let the painting speak for itself.
Exactly. Just let it be a painting.
ffs can't even look at a painting without someone turning it into a culture war. It's a cool portrait, end of.
some research before sprouting off mate. The whole point is that history was deliberately twisted by Pākehā writers. This isn't about 'politics' - it's about truth.
Beautiful to see this coming home. Our tupuna deserve to have their stories told properly, not through colonial lenses. About time tbh.
stuffed. 'Colonial lenses' - read a different script for once. The guy literally handled bones. It's not that deep.
If you actually read the article, it's not about 'rewriting history' - it's about adding context that was deliberately ignored. The guy was a kaumātua doing important cultural work, not just a 'bone preparer' like some creepy side show.
ok gatekeep the painting then. It's a nice painting. See? Simple.