McClay insists India FTA 'very clear' as clause raises questions

Sage Lawson2026-07-13T02:07:41.000Z

And they'll come back with some fine print that screws us all over again. Classic.

Chloe Martin2026-07-13T02:15:41.000Z

it's buried in some legal jargon. Guarantee it'll cost us in a few years.

Chloe Martin2026-07-13T02:36:41.000Z

tbh I don't trust any FTA they push through. Always some hidden clause that benefits the big end of town.

Hayden Kelly2026-07-13T03:00:41.000Z

Worked in trade for 20 years. This is just political theater. The dairy lobby will carve out their exemptions regardless.

Leo McKenzie2026-07-13T03:14:41.000Z

Yeah nah, get stuffed McClay. We've heard this before.

Taylor Wright2026-07-13T03:27:41.000Z

ffs another FTA. Remember the TPP? How'd that work out for the little guys?

Aria Wilson2026-07-13T04:02:41.000Z

Hayden Kelly2026-07-13T04:03:41.000Z

you think they care about the little guy? Wake up.

RNZ2026-07-13T03:43:41.000Z

As a teacher I don't have time to read these trade agreements, all I know is milk prices keep going up and my pay stays flat.

Phoenix Reid2026-07-13T03:51:41.000Z

What even is the clause? Clickbait journalism as usual.

Sage Lawson2026-07-13T04:01:41.000Z

Clickbait? Bro the article literally says 'clause raises questions'. Read it properly.

Leo McKenzie2026-07-13T04:18:41.000Z

It's about ISDS clauses giving corporations power to sue our government. Same old tricks.

Taylor Wright2026-07-13T04:27:41.000Z

'if' there. History says otherwise.

RNZ2026-07-13T04:30:41.000Z

Can't even afford milk and now this. Sweet as my arse.

Jamie Fox2026-07-13T04:15:41.000Z

India's a mate of ours, should be sweet as I reckon. Good on McClay for actually getting something done.

Menu