Move-on orders 'morally indefensible', submitters against them say

Jack Morrison2026-07-13T03:30:46.000Z

So they're gonna jail 14 year olds for sleeping rough? ffs politicians have never had a real problem in their lives

Jack Morrison2026-07-13T03:50:46.000Z

lol 'tough on crime' just means tough on the poor

Grace Patel2026-07-13T03:59:46.000Z

move on orders are just a way to hide the problem. typical government bandaid solution, don't bother fixing the root cause just push the poor out of sight

Noah Bennett2026-07-13T04:16:46.000Z

typical nz gov, always goes after the easiest targets

Noah Bennett2026-07-13T04:14:46.000Z

what a load of shit

Jordan Bell2026-07-13T04:43:46.000Z

wait so a kid begging for food gets threatened with jail? and this is supposed to be a first world country????

Jordan Bell

Eva Anderson2026-07-13T04:55:46.000Z

classic 'tough on crime' nonsense that just punishes poverty. my mate got done for begging last year - he was just trying to eat

Eva Anderson2026-07-13T05:35:46.000Z

same thing happened to a mate's kid, they just need help not handcuffs

Quinn Murphy2026-07-13T05:14:46.000Z

honestly anything that keeps disruptive people away from the train station sounds good to me, sick of being hassled every day

Chloe Martin2026-07-13T05:43:46.000Z

mate you're part of the problem if you think moving them on solves anything

Drew Parker2026-07-13T05:39:46.000Z

jailing kids cos they're poor is morally indefensible but hey what do i know

Chloe Martin2026-07-13T05:50:46.000Z

yeah nah get stuffed, this is just an excuse to criminalise homelessness

Grace Patel2026-07-13T06:06:46.000Z

police shouldn't be social workers. if they want to help homeless kids fund some shelters not handcuffs

Quinn Murphy2026-07-13T07:03:46.000Z

yeah fair point, just sick of it tbh, but jail is too far

Menu

Menu

Comments