Act and Green Party leaders go head to head | Ryan Bridge TODAY
Act and Green Party leaders go head to head | Ryan Bridge TODAY
NZ Herald ·
Act and Green Party leaders go head to head | Ryan Bridge TODAY
<!--mynz:youtube-chapters-->
{"v":1,"chapters":[{"timeSeconds":1,"label":"Introduction to Political Panel","summary":"The video begins with the host introducing the political panel, which includes Chloe Swarbrick from the Green Party and David Seymour from the ACT Party."},{"timeSeconds":13,"label":"Technical Difficulties and Banter","summary":"The host experiences a brief technical issue with the TV feed, leading to some lighthearted banter with the guests about the display."},{"timeSeconds":34,"label":"Discussion on School Lunches","summary":"The conversation shifts to school lunches, with the host mentioning that many children wish they hadn't seen the lunches provided. David Seymour highlights that half of the lunches were not nutritious enough."},{"timeSeconds":53,"label":"David Seymour's Points on Savings","summary":"David Seymour outlines two key points: saving $360 million over three years and not having these children face tax payers. He also mentions that the report did not cover the program before he took over."},{"timeSeconds":105,"label":"Critique of the Report's Scope","summary":"Seymour criticizes the report for not covering the program before his tenure, stating that while the cost savings were acknowledged, the challenges were not fully addressed."},{"timeSeconds":138,"label":"Chlöe Swarbrick's Perspective on the Issue","summary":"Chlöe Swarbrick expresses her view that the report is a failure, prompted by public concern, and that continuing to cut costs at the expense of nutritional value is a question for the country."},{"timeSeconds":199,"label":"Debate on Methamphetamine","summary":"The discussion moves to methamphetamine, with both leaders agreeing on banning its sale. Swarbrick questions if Seymour would support banning the sale of meth pipes."},{"timeSeconds":220,"label":"Economic Impact and Policy Differences","summary":"Seymour argues that his approach is more effective, saving money while still providing for children, whereas Swarbrick suggests that cutting costs leads to a more frantic work environment and less access to healthcare."}]}
<!--/mynz:youtube-chapters-->
