Trucks v cars - who should pay a bigger share of new congestion charges? | Ryan…
Trucks v cars - who should pay a bigger share of new congestion charges? | Ryan Bridge TODAY
NZ Herald ·
Trucks v cars - who should pay a bigger share of new congestion charges? | Ryan Bridge TODAY
NZ Herald ·
Bloody typical. Trucks deliver everything we buy but they want to slug us more while the politicians cruise in their tax-funded cars. Get stuffed.
cope. Trucks are literally bigger and heavier. Facts don't care about your feelings.
nah get stuffed. You sound like an AA propaganda bot.
Honestly, if they're gonna charge for congestion, make it fair. Trucks are essential for supply chains, cars are often just one person commuting. Charge both but give trucks a discount or something.
Actually, economic studies show that heavy vehicles cause disproportionate road wear and congestion. A higher charge for trucks is supported by the user-pays principle. Cars already pay through rego and fuel tax.
What a load of shit. Just another tax grab from the govt. They'll be charging us to breathe next.
Log in to leave a comment.
Trucks take up more space, cause more congestion, and damage roads more. Should pay more, simple as that.
Same. Typical academic who's never worked a real job.
ffs not this again. We already pay enough. Just fix the public transport so people don't need to drive. Problem solved.
Nah mate, trucks are the backbone of the economy. Hit cars harder, they're the ones clogging up the city during rush hour.
Exactly. Public transport would sort it, but nah, let's just keep punting the cost onto workers.
As an economics student, charging both by time and distance might actually be efficient. But lol at the idea of our government implementing that cleanly.
Facts. The city planners are a joke.
Who's Ryan Bridge anyway? Another media tosser stirring up division. Just scrap the whole idea.
pays is the only fair system. Your emotional arguments don't change basic economics.