In the second of a two-part series on the Supreme Court, Lady Deborah Chambers, KC, warns of judicial activism and lack of clarity.Now for the bad. Courts exis…
NZ Herald ·
Judicial activism? More like judicial wokeness. Let the judges interpret the law not make it up as they go.
she's literally a former judge. She knows what she's on about.
what a load of shit this article is. Chambers is just upset her side doesn't get to make the rules.
I actually think she raises a fair point about clarity. The law shouldn't be a guessing game.
ffs another chat about the supreme court, who cares at 5pm on a work day? 😴
cos some of us have to deal with the consequences of dodgy rulings?
Log in to leave a comment.
tbh the supreme court has been a mess since the 90s. Activist judges thinking they're politicians.
lol cope, the high court already does that and nobody cares
Bet she wouldn't be complaining if her own side was doing the 'activism'. Typical.
Exactly! Always a double standard with these people.
yeah nah get stuffed, courts should stick to the law not social experiments
facts
Some people in this thread clearly haven't read the actual judgments they're complaining about.
sounds like something an activist judge would say
